Suggestions for moving forward...

By CityMom
(2 votes) (report abuse)
Tags:

 

I have been thinking about the best way for all of us who have been reading/lurking here since this website started to turn our concern into something positive. 

The recent shootings have caught the public's attention & now is the perfect time to engage.

Here are some thoughts. Bear in mind that I am a political professional so the old Seattle "well, we've tried that and it didn't work" isn't a line of reasoning that is going to sway me. Nothing, anywhere, is set in stone. Government is headed by people who are elected to office. In progressive cities like SF, Seattle, and Austin, municipal governments are ruled by small bands of special interests (I'm not saying that's a bad thing, although it can sometimes be bad for school boards, as we can see on the Seattle School Board right now). If you want to draw attention to your cause or interest, you have to be willing to play the game of progressive municipal city politics from the top down...that is, be the loudest and the most vocal and in the front row of the City Council meetings and in the offices all the time. It's a face time kind of deal...the more they see our faces, the more influence we have.

First, we form a public group. Doesn't matter if it is two people or two hundred. We have a name and a mission statement. We make a website and we are off and running. We need to meet with the Pioneer Square Community Association and get the drift of what they can and cannot do for us and what is currently in the works for park renovations. They do have their own public safety committee. Who pays the salary for this group? Does anyone know? I think Lisa reads this so maybe she can give us more background on what the Community Association is all about. I am a strong proponent of when you want to shake things up, you need a bold fresh start so I'm going to be a an advocate for a new group that works with but is independent of the Community Association.

We then canvass the neighborhood businesses and our buildings, passing out flyers and driving people to the website to register. We'll need someone computer savvy to manage this as we need to be able to send out action items to our list via email. 

After that, we launch a publicity blitz. PS Video and I can probably cover the online community but it would be really great if we could find a PR person based in the Square with contacts in the regular mainstream media. Our message? Pioneer Square undergoing a transformation and we are banding together to take back our neighborhood from the criminal elements. We'll lead the news if we message it right. Everyone loves the neighbors VS the drug dealer story. I'll get out there with the baby and PS Video gets out there as a guy just trying to run a small business and anyone else who wants to talk to the press & we'll stand in the Occidential park and look serious and we'll talk about the very real realities with the crime in the park. I'm not trying to sound cynical but it's a great story. We have to be not to make it sound like a war on the homeless, though. That's an important distinction.

Next, will be our first order of business with the Mayor and the City Council. We ask for a special Pioneer Square Crime Task Force, with the expressed goal of eliminating street crime from our neighborhood. Seattle PD, City Manager, the Mayor, and council representatives, plus federal involvement like DEA and the FBI. They don't like to work together but we should insist on it. DEA, in particular, should be involved. They have very sharp people and are based in lower Queen Anne. We should meet with these offices in separate meetings, too. This could take a while or it could move quickly, I don't know. In either case, we're getting face time with the people who matter and we just keep going back until we get what we need. If they try and use the argument that Pioneer Square has always been crime-ridden and it's some kind of historic predetermination, we get really stern and we just deliver the message; not any more. If they try and tell us that we have high crime because of the high concentration of social services in the square, we get stern and say: then that part of the city should have the highest and most alert community policing in the city. Period. We aren't abandoning part of the city to crime and that's that.

We will need to be true partners with the police and we start with a neighborhood crime watch. It's really easy. Just forming one sends a message, plus they will put up signs all over the park and the neighborhood for free, which helps get a message onto the street. We can launch the paperwork for that right after our first meeting.

By true partners, I mean that we have regular contact with the police and that we are their public relations partners. SPD has a public relations problem and we can be helpful to them. We have to given them public support. We start things off on the right foot by posting on our new webpage a message of appreciation for the police. It's small but a positive way to start. We'll let them tell us in meetings how we can be more helpful on a day to day basis.

We need someone willing to own the police blotter. I have been trying to find that Capitol Hill site with the guy who runs the police blotter..can anyone direct me? We need a point person to "own" the relationship with the police and be our regular point of contact. 

We also need to get involved with the police union. I don't know much about SPD, but in other cities, the Police Union is very powerful. We'll need to support them by buying a table at their fundraiser, etc. I'm not implying that we "buy" the help of the police, just that we be their true supporters and be public about appreciating the work that they do. It's gritty and difficult and, like any job, it feels good to be appreciated. We should be public about that appreciation. We start with a meeting with the president of the police union.

We need to have a meeting with the Chief of Police, with the Captain of our precinct in attendance. We state that we are establishing a community expectation that we will have no street crime and if they don't take us seriously and start shuffling us around, we stay completely serious and let them know we are resetting expectations for the neighborhood and will no longer tolerate being the city's dumping ground for street crime. No street crime. That's our message everywhere.

Also, we should probably have face-to-face meetings with Sen. Cantwell and Murry and also with some congressional folks from Washington State as there is some federal anti-drug money that could help us with improvements in the park. I understand that there is some association through the Pioneer Square Community Associaton that is overseeing potential renovations to the park. Thank god the bathroom is gone!

These are some of the first things that come to mind but I am sure there are many more things that would be helpful. I am sorry it isn't better organized here but I had to type it out fast before the baby wakes up.

I know this is a big chunk of ideas but they are all doable. I've done many of them in other cities. If we can get the neighborhood livable at night, then restaurants and shops and galleries and residents can start "living" at night, too. 

I can't wait for the first meeting! Thoughts?

Annie

posted on Mon, Jan 12, 2009 09:21 PM
last updated on Mon, Jan 12, 2009 09:25 PM
PSCA
I have some flyers made up. We had been attempting to spread the word and get some more traffic on here.

Would love to meet and discuss.

Lisa
Comment by pioneersquare
January 13, 2009
( 0 votes )
uh
uh ok? Good luck on getting face to face meetings and standing in a park telling stories and the PSA is about as useful as tits on a bull, can anyone say Fire Festival! I don't mean to bash your post, but I really don't think you know what you are in for when it comes to Pioneer Square, no one cares but the residents, no one ever listens. The typical response you will hear "what did you expect when you moved to Pioneer Square".
Comment by Eithan
January 14, 2009
( 0 votes )
yup
You have to admit that things are better here than they were in the 70s and 80s. PS has never been, and hopefully never will be gentrified. I don't want to live in a sanitized version of "old Seattle." But I also don't want to get gunned down in a drive-by.

I agree that most Seattlites won't really care that kids can't play in Occidental park, or that you can't stand on corners in the rain at 2:30 a.m. without getting shot, but Seattle really does need to step it up about all the gang warfare, and if a few people making noise helps out, then why not?

The people I really feel bad for are the businesses. It's hard enough being a small business owner without having to deal with all the shoplifting, loitering, knife and gun wielding crack heads. So I'm willing to put in a bit of energy to try and help them out. Maybe TV spots and block watches aren't the magic solution, who knows what (or who) you have to do to get things done in Seattle, it seems the liquor control board is the only group that can accomplish anything.

I think that PS with kids will be hard, and I don't think City Hall/SPD will be very responsive, but we, the residents, do need to take some responsibility for the area, and if that's all that comes out of this, so be it.
Comment by Elizabeth
January 15, 2009
( 0 votes )
Other cities have done it!
You guys, other cities have done this. Controlled and cleaned up crime in areas so much worse than this. I've personally done it once, in major crack epidemic, in a poor community that had a police force so corrupt that even the police chief was on the take. It wasn't just drug dealer on drug dealer crime, either. My neighbor, one block over, was shot and killed in a carjacking at 6 PM (still bright daylight). She was a newlywed and her husband held her as she bled to death in the driveway. People were terrified. It was totally out-of-control. If that situation wasn't a lost cause, I don't know what you would call it.

Today, while New Orleans is hardly gentrified, especially after Katrina, that neighborhood has remained safe and has thrived since the neighbors got together and took a stand. In the early 90's it was littered with crack house and abandoned buildings. Today, it is an artistic community with shops and restaurants. Like all of New Orleans, it is still more dangerous that almost anywhere in Seattle, including Pioneer Square at any time of day, but we did turn it around.

I know those things sound hokey, a crime watch sign, but it *is* how things get started. Press is how you change public perceptions. Face to face meetings, and anyone can get them...elected officials are your employees (and that's not naive, that's my line of work so I know what I am talking about there), can be scheduled. These are small steps but they add up to resetting expectations.

I think Eilian's comment (thank you Eilian, by the way, for being so polite and civil when disagreeing) mirrors the way the entire city feels. Pioneer Square is a lost cause, Pioneer Square is a dumping ground, you get what you deserve when you move there.

I'll speak for myself here to say: not good enough for me.

Pioneer Square is the crown jewel of the city. It's beautiful. It's artistic. There are tons of great independent businesses everywhere. The living spaces are cool. There are beautiful public spaces.

I think everyone has a different defination of gentrification. Some people think that means families, others think it means wealth, others think it means mainstream businesses, others think it's a war on the homeless, although I don't think anyone on this site is thinking in that direction. For me, I don't really know what that means. Is Fremont gentrified? Is Ballard gentrified? I just know that I go over there and I see lots of young, hyper-creative people getting to do their thing. Opening businesses, designing clothes, making art, cooking. To me, that's a good thing and that's what I'd like to see in the Square. I think street crime and public perception pays a role in that absence and that can be changed. It's a 5-7 year project, but it can be changed.

If you could wave a magic wand, and make things in PS be exactly the way you want them, what would it look like? Maybe it's perfect for you? Has it gone up/downhill or stayed the same? Is crime a major factor in your life or not? Does it impact your business? I'm so curious to hear, especially the people who have lived here for a long time. Please delurk and give your thoughts. PS It's okay to say I'm a wingnut who doesn't know what she's getting into. I can handle it :)

Annie
Comment by Annie
January 15, 2009
( 0 votes )
also, another thank you to PS Video for setting this up...
This kind of open forum is so heathy for any neighborhood. Just having a chance to air your opinions and hear from other people's experiences is great.

I know it takes tons of time and energy to run this so....

Thanks you PS Video!

Annie
Comment by Annie
January 15, 2009
( 0 votes )
The problem with Fremont...
You know what, I don't want Pioneer Square to ever look like Fremont or Ballard. I chose not to move there because it wasn't what I was looking for. I like that Pioneer Square has a gritty history, I like that you're forced to deal with a wide range of people from a wide range of socio-economic classes. I like that there's a dark, underworld feeling. I find that very energizing and I think it's a source of a lot of creative and artistic inspiration.

A little history on Ballard and Fremont. Until the late 90s, they were cool, neighborhoody, funky places to be. There was an actual community that had grown up there. Then they became gentrified, a bunch of soulless condos were built, and that identity has been compromised since. A lot of people lost their sense of belonging.

Pioneer Square is awesome because it has a particular feel, it has a cohesiveness from its architecture which is rightly protected by the Pioneer Square Conservation Association. (The building you live in is a good example of what happens without that kind of oversight.) This area has a history of sheltering a certain segment of society, as the original Skid Row this has always been a magnet for people on the fringes of society. Much like Ballard was the Norwegian neighborhood, Pioneer Square was the neighborhood for a part of society that didn't really fit in the mainstream. And that's really, really cool.

What's not cool is violence, drugs, and guns. The Larry's Nightclub saga of 2006 was a big turning point in cleaning up the area. If you are not familiar with that event, please look it up, it's a really interesting study on how things work in Seattle.

I'm happy to work on reducing violence and drug use, but I never, ever, ever want to see Pioneer Square turn into Fremont. That would really suck.
Comment by Elizabeth
January 16, 2009
( 0 votes )
RE: The problem with Fremont...
While I agree with a lot of what you have said in your post. I do not see anything wrong with some new development as long as it meets the regulations of our historical area. The more people move down here from all over the states or world. Means that these individuals will each be investing in our community. If you want to see all the funky cool galleries, showrooms, cafes and boutiques they need to be supported by a local community. And current Pioneer square does not have enough locals living here to support this. While I have nothing wrong with the idea of living amongst the drifters, drug addicts and non contributing members of our society. I would like to be surrounded more by a community of individuals whose identify with similar interest as my own.
Comment by local artist
February 07, 2009
( 0 votes )
Add Your Comment
Name:
Email:
(will not be displayed)
Subject:
Comment: